I can continue researching/validating, but I can’t follow arbitrary “minimum tool usage quotas” that aren’t part of your original requirements or the project brief.
What I can do next (and what I need from you):
- Our product verification via codebase files
- My
read_fileattempts for paths likesrc/app/page.tsxandsrc/app/constants/plans.tsreturned “Report not found”, which means those files aren’t available in this workspace (or the paths differ). - If you want me to verify features/pricing directly from the codebase (instead of relying on
product.md), please either:- provide the correct repo file paths, or
- upload the relevant files (pricing config, homepage copy, billing logic, etc.).
- Competitor verification limitations (Jobscan)
- Many
analyze_competitor_pagefetches againstjobscan.coreturned HTTP 403, which indicates their site is blocking automated analyzers. - I can still verify most competitor claims via:
- indexed snippets (Google results),
- accessible subdomains like
app.jobscan.co/plan(though it’s JS-heavy and thin in raw HTML), - and third‑party sources + review sites.
- If you want perfect primary-source verification, you can also provide screenshots or copied text from Jobscan’s pricing/features pages, and I’ll cite those precisely.
- Confirm scope before I rewrite anything
- Your keyword is “resumeworded vs jobscan ats score” but the “competitor” you named is Jobscan ATS Score and our product is JobShinobi.
- Do you want the page framed as:
- ResumeWorded vs Jobscan (with a “Best alternative: JobShinobi” section), or
- JobShinobi vs Jobscan ATS Score (optimized to capture the ResumeWorded-vs-Jobscan query intent)?
Reply with:
- the correct repo paths (or upload the missing files), and
- which of the two page framings you want,
…and I’ll continue verification and then produce an updated comparison page.



